Skip to content

Vivek Kaul

  • Articles
  • About
    • About Vivek Kaul
    • Media Appearances
  • Books
    • Bad Money
    • Easy Money: Book 1
    • Easy Money: Book 2
    • Easy Money: Book 3
    • India’s Big Government
  • Econ Central
  • Contact

Vivek Kaul

  • Articles
  • About
    • About Vivek Kaul
    • Media Appearances
  • Books
    • Bad Money
    • Easy Money: Book 1
    • Easy Money: Book 2
    • Easy Money: Book 3
    • India’s Big Government
  • Econ Central
  • Contact
14 January, 2016

The Chinese Trilemma

china

 

This column is essentially an extension of yesterday’s column. At the outset I would like to thank Anindya Banerjee who works at the FX and interest rate desk at Kotak Securities, for putting me on this track. The idea for this column came from him.

As I discussed in the column yesterday, China has been using its massive foreign exchange reserves to defend the value of the yuan against the dollar. Between December 2014 and December 2015, the People’s Bank of China, the Chinese central bank, has used $557 billion to defend the yuan against the dollar.

Don't miss a post

In the process the Chinese foreign exchange reserves fell by 14.5% to $3.33 trillion between December 2014 and December 2015. Interestingly, this is the first time since December 1999 that Chinese foreign exchange reserves have fallen during the course of a year.

For more than eighteen months, the total amount of dollars leaving China has been higher than the dollars coming into it. The Chinese foreign exchange market is heavily rigged by the Chinese central bank. In a freer environment, as dollars would have left China, those taking their money out of China would have sold yuan and bought dollars. This would have pushed up the demand for dollars.

In the process, dollar would have appreciated and the yuan depreciated. China has intervened heavily in the foreign exchange market over the years to ensure that the yuan has had a more or less fixed value against the dollar, for extended periods of time.

In an environment where more dollars are leaving China than entering it, fixing the value of the yuan against the dollar is a tricky thing to do. People taking their money out of China need to sell yuan and buy dollars. In a freer market, this would mean the yuan depreciating and the dollar appreciating. In order to maintain a fixed value, the Chinese central bank has to intervene.

In order to ensure that there is no scarcity of dollars in the market, it buys yuan and sells dollars. The trouble is that China cannot create dollars out of thin air, only the Federal Reserve of the United States can do that. China does not have an endless supply of dollars. This explains why the People’s Bank of China has allowed a gradual depreciation of the yuan against the dollar over the last six months. In August 2015, one dollar was worth around 6.30 yuan. Currently, one dollar is worth around 6.57 yuan.

Over and above this China also faces what economists call “the impossible trinity” or simply the trilemma. This essentially means that any central bank cannot pursue a stable exchange rate policy, allow a free movement of capital in and out of the country and at the same time run an independent interest rate policy.

How is this applicable in the Chinese case? For more than eighteen months, the total amount of dollars leaving China has been greater than the total number dollars entering it. The Chinese central bank has defended the value of the yuan against the dollar (i.e. tried to have a stable exchange rate) by selling dollars and buying yuan. When it does this, it leads to a scarcity of yuan in the financial system. This is likely to push up interest rates. Given that economic growth has been slow, a higher interest rate is not something that the Chinese central bank wants.

And this is where the trilemma comes in. If the People’s Bank of China wants a stable exchange rate against the dollar and a reasonably free movement of dollars into and outside China, then it loses control of the interest rate that it wants to set in the economy.

If it wants to control the interest rate in such an environment, then it needs to print or create yuan digitally and pump it into the financial system. This will ensure that there are enough yuan going around and interest rates will continue to remain low. But the moment there are enough yuan going around, yuan will again start to depreciate against the dollar.

What happens if the Chinese central bank stops defending the value of the yuan against the dollar? Given that, more dollars are leaving China than entering it, the value of the dollar would appreciate against the yuan. The value of the yuan would depreciate against the dollar. This would happen very quickly. But a lower Chinese yuan would hurt those who have borrowed in dollars. And there could be significant debt defaults.

As Banerjee points out in a recent research note titled Economic Trilemma and China: “It is estimated that between USD 1-2 trillion of unhedged carry trades may been floating in the Chinese economy (the guys who have borrowed in US Dollar and invested in Yuan interest rate to capture the interest rate differential) by the end of 2014. A sharp and swift depreciation in the value of the Yuan can cause these players to panic, which may lead to a situation of run on the financial system.”

What this means is that if the value of the yuan depreciates rapidly against the dollar, a lot of investors who have invested in China would suddenly need more yuan to buy the dollars they need to pay off their dollar debts. This would lead to a situation where these investors would sell yuan to buy dollars, in order to pay off their dollar debts.

It is worth remembering here that further the yuan falls in value against the dollar, more will be the yuan required by these investors to buy the dollars they need to repay their dollar debt. In order to limit this, many investors would want to sell yuan and buy dollars at the same time, before the yuan falls any further. As these investors sell yuan and buy dollars, there will be tremendous pressure on the value of the yuan. And what these investors would have wanted to avoid, their actions would end up triggering i.e. a significantly lower value of the yuan against the dollar.

In order to avoid this situation, the People’s Bank of China will have to keep selling dollars and buying yuan. But there is only so many dollars that the Chinese central bank has. As Banerjee says the situation can lead to a run on the financial system.

And that is something that the Chinese government as well as the central bank would like to avoid. Hence, in the days to come, there will be no rapid depreciation in the value of the yuan against the dollar. Having said that a slow and steady depreciation of the yuan against the dollar is likely to continue. This is primarily because even though the Chinese have more than three trillion dollars as foreign exchange reserves not all of it is liquid. As I had discussed in yesterday’s column, these reserves are invested in financial securities all over the world. And not all of these securities can be sold immediately to get dollars in order to defend the value of the yuan against the dollar.

Wei Yao and Jason Daw of Societe Generale in an August 2015 report estimated that the ar chest of People’s Bank of China “is sizeable, but not unlimited.” “We think that $1 trillion is the absolute maximum the People’s Bank of China can sell,” they wrote.

Between July end and December end the Chinese central bank has sold around $321 billion in order to defend the value of the yuan against the dollar. They still have a lot of money left, but things could get tricky if money keeps leaving China.

The column originally appeared on Vivek Kaul’s Diary on January 14, 2016

  • tweet 
  • share 
  • share 
  • share 
Categories Easy Money, Equitymaster, Vivek Kaul's Diary
Post navigation
George Soros Has Got a Backache Again and This Time It’s Because of China
Dear Mr Modi who will sort out the mess at Food Corporation of India?

Subscribe

Get notified of new posts by email.

Vivek Kaul is a widely published economic commentator. He is also the author of five books. His fifth book Bad Money—Inside the NPA Mess and How It Threatens the Indian Banking System, has just been released. He is also the author of the Easy Money trilogy.
More here.

My Books

Recently

  • How the American real estate bubble impacts you and your investments
  • शिक्षित बेरोज़गारी के दस साल 
  • On Bappi Lahiri – He was way more than just the Disco King
  • Gabbar’s motto would’ve been better than Lata’s song, Mr Das
  • Explained: Why the Govt is Misleading Us on High Fuel Prices and Oil Bonds

Categories

Subscribe

Don't miss a post

Archives

  • July 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • June 2020
  • April 2020
  • December 2019
  • January 2019
  • July 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • October 2011
  • August 2011

Categories

  • Agriculture
  • Analysis
  • Anchoring
  • Arun Jaitley
  • AsiaTimes
  • Atmanirbharta
  • Automobiles
  • bad loans
  • Bangalore Mirror
  • Banking
  • BBC
  • Bitcoins
  • BJP
  • Black money
  • Bonds
  • Book Review
  • Books
  • Branding
  • Budget
  • bullshit
  • Business
  • Business Standard
  • Business Today
  • Business World
  • Cars
  • Chidambaram
  • China
  • Cinema
  • Coal
  • Congress
  • Corona
  • Covid
  • Cricket
  • Cryptocurrency
  • Daily News and Analysis
  • DailyO
  • Deccan Chronicle
  • Deccan Herald
  • Democracy
  • demonetisation
  • Dhoni
  • Easy Money
  • Easynomics
  • Equitymaster
  • Explainer
  • Farmers
  • Financial Crisis
  • FirstBiz
  • Firstpost
  • Forbes India
  • GDP
  • Gold
  • Government borrowing
  • GST
  • Hindi
  • Home
  • Huffington Post India
  • Humor
  • Incentives
  • Income Tax
  • India Today
  • Indian economy
  • Indira Gandhi
  • Inflation
  • Interest Rates
  • Interview
  • Investing
  • Jawaharlal Nehru
  • Khaleej Times
  • Life
  • Low interest rates
  • Macroeconomy
  • Maths
  • Media
  • Midday
  • Mint
  • Money printing
  • Movies
  • Mumbai Mirror
  • Mutual Fund Insight
  • Mutual Funds
  • MxMIndia
  • Narendra Modi
  • Newslaundry
  • Obituary
  • Oil
  • Personal Finance
  • Policy
  • Politics
  • Ponzi
  • Pragati
  • Public Sector Banks
  • Quartz
  • Raghuram Rajan
  • Rahul Gandhi
  • Rant
  • RBI
  • Real Estate
  • Rupee
  • Satire
  • Self
  • Short Story
  • social objectives
  • Sonia Gandhi
  • Stocks
  • Swarajya
  • Taxes
  • The 5 Minute Wrapup
  • The Asian Age
  • The Corporate Dossier
  • The Daily Reckoning
  • The Quint
  • Uncategorized
  • Unemployment
  • Vaccination
  • ValueResearchOnline
  • Vivek Kaul's Diary
  • Wealth Insight
  • WhatsApp
  • Yahoo
  • Zomato

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
Copyright 2023 Vivek Kaul.
Design: Madhu Menon
RSS FEED