{"id":1829,"date":"2013-04-29T17:05:27","date_gmt":"2013-04-29T11:35:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/teekhapan.wordpress.com\/?p=1829"},"modified":"2013-04-29T17:05:27","modified_gmt":"2013-04-29T11:35:27","slug":"memo-to-sonia-nrega-wasnt-game-changer-growth-was","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/vivekkaul.com\/2013\/04\/29\/memo-to-sonia-nrega-wasnt-game-changer-growth-was\/","title":{"rendered":"Memo to Sonia: NREGA wasn\u2019t game-changer, growth was"},"content":{"rendered":"


\n\"mgnrega-265_1295452615\"<\/a>\u00a0<\/span>
\nVivek Kaul<\/span><\/span><\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/strong>
\n\u201c<\/span>Perception is reality,\u201d goes the old saying. And the perception among the\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/span>jhollawallas\u00a0<\/i><\/span><\/span><\/span>who\u00a0belong to the\u00a0Congress party led United Progressive Alliance (UPA)is that the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) has been a swashbuckling success, which has led to a tremendous increase in rural incomes. So free doles have led to higher income and that in turn has created economic growth, is a conclusion that is often drawn.
\nA new working paper titled\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/span>Rising Farm Wages in India – The \u2018Pull\u2019 and \u2018Push\u2019 Factors\u00a0<\/i><\/span><\/span><\/span>written by Ashok Gulati, Surbhi Jain and Nidhi Satija of the Commission for Agricultural Costs and Prices(CACP), Ministry of Agriculture, goes a long way in busting this perception.
\nThe real farm wages (i.e. rise in wages adjusted for inflation) grew by 3.7% during the 1990s. The growth fell to 2.1% in 2000s. \u201cSo, if real wages had\u00a0followed the same trend of 1990s in 2000s, the current level of real farm wages would have been higher than what it is today with MGNREGA,\u201d the authors point out.
\nWhat is interesting nonetheless is that the data in the 2000s can be divided into two very different parts. Between 2000-01 and 2006-2007, the farm wages declined by 1.8% per year whereas they grew by 6.8% between 2007-2008 and 2011-2012.
\nOn February 2, 2006, MGNREGA was launched in 200 of the most backward districts of the country. The coverage of the scheme was

\n<\/a>to all the rural districts from April 1, 2008. The scheme aims at providing at least 100 days of guaranteed employment in a financial year to every household whose adults are willing to do unskilled manual work.
\nPayments under MGNREGA vary from Rs 120 to Rs 179 per day, depending on the state. \u201cAt the national level, with the average\u00a0nominal wage paid under the scheme increasing from Rs 65 in FY 2006\u201007 to Rs 115 in FY 2011\u201012… It has set a base price for labour in rural areas, improved the bargaining power of labourers and has led to a widespread increase in the cost of unskilled and temporary labour including agricultural labour,\u201d write the authors of the CACP report.
\nGuaranteed wages under MGNREGA have increased the wage expectations, although the employment generated under MGNREGA has been less than 10% of the total rural employment in most of the states, during most of the years.\u00a0And this has led to an increase in farm wages of 6.8% between 2007-2008 and 2011-2012. Or so goes the logic, at least among the\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/span>jhollawallas.\u00a0<\/i><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\nBut causation is not so easy to establish, even though prima facie that might seem to be the case. There are factors other than MGNREGA at work as well. Take the construction sector for example, which competes with agriculture for labour. The share of workforce that is engaged in construction has increased from 3.1% in 1993-94 to 9.6% in 2009-2010. During the same period the share of work force engaged in Indian agriculture declined from 65% to 53%.
\nAs the CACP authors point out \u201cAccording to 64thround of\u00a0National Sample Survey (Migration in India), 2007\u201008, nearly 57 per cent of urban migrant households migrated from rural areas and mostly for employment related reasons. For rural males, around 20 percent were employed as casual labour after migration…Thus, construction activity certainly competes for rural labour and would act as a pull on farm wages.\u201d
\nSo taking these arguments into account, the CACP authors constructed a statistical model to test what really impacts farm wages. And this throws up some interesting results. A growth of 10% in construction pushes up the farm wages by 2.8%. A 10% increase in overall economic growth (measured through growth in the Gross Domestic Product) pushes up farm wages by 2.4%.
\nAnd what about MGNREGA? \u201cImpact of\u00a0MGNREGA is also significant with 10 percent increase in employment generated leading to around 0.3 \u2013 0.5% increase in farm wages,\u201d write the authors. While, the impact of MGNREGA on farm wages is significant, it is nowhere near the impact that a rise in real economic activity, which is measured through an increase in construction GDP or overall GDP, has had on farm wages. As the authors point out \u201cThe impact of growth variables (GDP\u00a0(overall) or GDP (agri) or GDP(construction)) is almost 4\u20106 times higher than the MGNREGA impact.\u201d
\nThe impact that MGNREGA has varies across states. In states like Andhra Pradesh, Assam, Madhya Pradesh, Punjab, Tamil Nadu and West Bengal the impact of MGNREGA is better in comparison to other states. But even in this case the impact of real economic activity on farm wages is much greater. Also, the impact that MGNREGA is not significant in states like Bihar, Uttar Pradesh and Odisha, which are among the poorest states in India.
\nSo what is the conclusion that one can draw from this? Simply put, real economic activity has a greater impact on real income than free doles given out by the government. And farm wage would have grown at a much faster rate if the government had taken steps to increase real economic activity.
\nAs the authors point out \u201cThese results raise a pertinent policy issue: given fiscal constraints and high food inflation, if there was a trade\u2010off between allocating resources for welfare schemes and increasing investments with a view to raise farm wages, could the money spent on MGNREGA (more than Rs 2 lakh crore) not be better used if it was for investment in say rural\u2010urban construction, or for overall growth, or for agrigrowth? These investments would have raised the growth rates in these sectors, and thereby \u2018pulled\u2019 the real farm wages through a natural process of development, whereby wages increase broadly in line with rising labour productivity…making the whole process much more economically efficient and sustainable.\u201d
\nThere have been reports of gross irregularities in the NREGA scheme. As the authors write \u201cwith the current…Minister of Rural\u00a0Development himself asking for a CAG probeand the former Minister of Rural Development also alleging lack of effective monitoring. This has serious implications on the overall investment\/resource allocation strategy.\u201d
\nBut then who is bothered about leakages and sustainable economic growth. It is all about winning the next Lok Sabha election.<\/span><\/span><\/span>
\nRead\u00a0
the full research paper here
\n<\/a>The
article <\/a>originally appeared on www.firstpost.com on April 29, 2013
\n\u00a0(Vivek Kaul is a writer. He tweets @kaul_vivek)<\/b><\/i><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n\u00a0<\/span>
\n\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\u00a0 Vivek Kaul\u00a0 \u201cPerception is reality,\u201d goes the old saying. And the perception among the\u00a0jhollawallas\u00a0who\u00a0belong to the\u00a0Congress party led United Progressive Alliance (UPA)is that the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) has been a swashbuckling success, which has led to a tremendous increase in rural incomes. So free doles have led to higher … <\/p>\n

Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"qubely_global_settings":"","qubely_interactions":"","_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2,33,59],"tags":[333,583,750,1229,1740,2165,2284],"qubely_featured_image_url":null,"qubely_author":{"display_name":"Vivek Kaul","author_link":"https:\/\/vivekkaul.com\/author\/vivekkaul\/"},"qubely_comment":0,"qubely_category":"Analysis<\/a> Firstpost<\/a> Politics<\/a>","qubely_excerpt":"\u00a0 Vivek Kaul\u00a0 \u201cPerception is reality,\u201d goes the old saying. And the perception among the\u00a0jhollawallas\u00a0who\u00a0belong to the\u00a0Congress party led United Progressive Alliance (UPA)is that the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) has been a swashbuckling success, which has led to a tremendous increase in rural incomes. So free doles have led to higher…","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/vivekkaul.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1829"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/vivekkaul.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/vivekkaul.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vivekkaul.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vivekkaul.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1829"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/vivekkaul.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1829\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/vivekkaul.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1829"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vivekkaul.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1829"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vivekkaul.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1829"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}